Who was talking about capital letters?

“Diversity is a good; it just isn’t the only one. When competence isn’t the first criterion for appointments, everybody loses—including those women and people of color whose credentials are questioned because everyone knows those credentials were not the decisive factor in appointing them. This remains true even when Trump’s competence-free administration is so glaring that it seems to confirm the woke charge that references to competence were always an excuse to keep white men (and an occasional blond woman) in power. Yet sometimes competence really is sacrificed to representation. You’re unlikely to say it in public, but anyone reading these lines can think of examples. 15 Since January 20, 2025, the tribe being represented has changed, and disregard for quality has assumed staggering proportions. 

That group has historically held more power than any other. The claim that they should make room for others is one that many have come to accept. But when the focus on ethnic identity is elevated to first principle, champions of white supremacy will come out of the woodwork to claim it’s their turn for adequate representation. Once justice is constructed as taking power for your tribe, what’s left of politics but cold civil war? 

Prioritizing representation over competence is closely connected to preferring subjectivity to truth. This is not a generational difference. I’ve heard distinguished older scholars give powerful arguments against lies and legends, only to recoil from the word truth. Sometimes they quote Kuhn or Rorty and proclaim “I don’t believe in truth with a capital T.” Who was talking about capital letters? The question is not about metaphysical foundations but about our ability to recognize lies. After years of hearing the woke praise people for “speaking their truth,” why should we be surprised that Facebook did away with fact-checking? Inadequate as it was, at least it preserved a concept of fact. 

Only the French philosopher of science Bruno Latour was self-reflective enough to offer a public mea culpa for his own contributions to public distrust of matters of fact. At a time when Republicans use scientific uncertainties to oppose measures addressing the climate crisis or the production of vaccines, he wondered if he’d been wrong to help invent the field known as science studies, which problematized the distinction between subject and object, and emphasized the political and social dimensions of science. 

“What’s the real difference,” Latour wrote in 2004, between conspiracists and a popularized, that is a teachable version inspired by a too quick reading of, let’s say, a sociologist as eminent as Pierre Bourdieu? In both cases you have to learn to become suspicious of everything people say. . . . Of course conspiracy theories are an absurd defamation of our own arguments but, like weapons smuggled through a fuzzy border to the wrong party, these are our weapons nonetheless. 16”

— Call It Evil: Understanding the Trump Era by Susan Neiman
https://a.co/0gkffMYe

Think for yourselves, American scholars (but not BY yourselves)

On this day in 1837, Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered his famous “American Scholar” address to the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Harvard. He told the students to think for themselves rather than absorb thought, to create rather than repeat, and not to look to Europe for cultural models...

https://www.garrisonkeillor.com/radio-categories/twa-2018/

Antje Gimmler

I Am An American Philosopher: Antje Gimmler

-An Interview Series by John Capps-

https://american-philosophy.org/i-am-an-american-philosopher-interview-series/i-am-an-american-philosopher-antje-gimmler/

Debate start dates

“My undergraduates open their free will essays the same way every term: "The problem of free will has been debated since time immemorial." It hasn't. Socrates never mentions it. It isn't in Plato or Aristotle. Not because they missed it — because they had no concept of will for it to be free or unfree. The thing you assume is the most basic fact about being a person turns out to have a start date.“ https://substack.com/@davidjfrost/note/c-320219158?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Applied Philosophy Lyceum: Oct 2, 5 pm, COE 164

The Digital Cave

Reading, Thinking, and Dwelling in the Age of the Algorithm

An Applied Philosophy Talk by John Kaag

Abstract

We live in an era of industrial-scale shadow-play. The map of reality is no longer drawn from our own experience but projected by algorithms designed to keep us looking at a particular kind of wall. This talk argues that the oldest resources in the philosophical canon offer the most precise diagnosis of our newest predicament. Plato's cave anticipates the architecture of the feed—with one grim perversion: his prisoners at least shared a wall, while the algorithm builds a bespoke cavern for each of us. The Buddhist vocabulary of maya, tanha, and upadana describes with uncanny accuracy the mechanics of craving, clinging, and curated selfhood that the infinite scroll exploits. And Heidegger's account of Enframing—read alongside his catastrophic biography, which cannot be waved away—explains how attention itself became “standing reserve,” a resource to be extracted.

The talk concludes with the question increasingly posed to our machines: why is talking to a large language model so strange? The answer reveals a schism between information and meaning, between the calculative synthesis at which AI excels and the meditative, embodied, abductive thinking that a life—with something at stake—alone makes possible. Philosophy's task has not changed since the cave: to make us suspicious of the reality that appears most obvious, and to recover the gritty practices that might let us turn our heads, a few degrees, toward the light.

About the Speaker

John Kaag is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, External Professor at the Santa Fe Institute, and Visiting Professor at Harvard Divinity School. He is the author of three widely acclaimed books published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux: American Philosophy: A Love Story, Hiking with Nietzsche: On Becoming Who You Are, and Sick Souls, Healthy Minds: How William James Can Save Your Life. These books were named NPR Best Books of the Year and New York Times Editors' Choice selections.

His work bridges American pragmatism, intellectual history, ethics, and the philosophy of technology, and he writes regularly for general audiences on why philosophy still matters for everyday life.

Sane and happy

“Finally, I would like to assure my many Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim friends that I am sincerely happy that the religion which Chance has given you has contributed to your peace of mind (and often, as Western medical science now reluctantly admits, to your physical well-being). 

Perhaps it is better to be un-sane and happy, than sane and un-happy. But it is best of all to be sane and happy. Whether our descendants can achieve that goal will be the greatest challenge of the future. Indeed, it may well decide whether we have any future.”

—Arthur C. Clarke 

Colombo, Sri Lanka September 19, 1996

3001: The Final Odyssey Valediction/afterword
https://a.co/0aG1eeZZ

“Why should I strive for happiness?”

Looking forward to John Kaag’s October 2 MTSU Lyceum visit, when I’m sure he’ll affirm the possibility of happiness in work. I’ve decided we’ll read this book in Existentialism just before he arrives (and we’ll read how William James saved his life in CoPhi then, too).

“For Nietzsche, I consoled myself, the point was not about avoiding or even conquering suffering: he recognized, like so many philosophers before him, that suffering was a fundamental fact of human existence. But the ascetic response to suffering was to understand it as a complaint about life. My challenge—the challenge Nietzsche raises—was to embrace life with all its suffering. When he wrote, at the very end of his career, “Have I been understood? Dionysus versus the Crucified,” he meant to show that suffering does not refute life as we experience it but must be welcomed, embraced, in exactly the same way we welcome and embrace happiness. In fact, Nietzsche often sounds as though happiness is at best a kind of secondary goal. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche’s most famous character, having spent his life in the mountains, concludes: “Happiness? Why should I strive for happiness? I strive for my work.””

— Hiking with Nietzsche: On Becoming Who You Are by John J. Kaag
https://a.co/02BXPDFc

Emerson’s divinity school address

On this date in 1838, Ralph Waldo Emerson(books by this author) delivered a commencement address to the Harvard Divinity School. Emerson had graduated from Harvard Divinity in 1826. Before he graduated, he had given a lecture called “The American Scholar” to the Harvard Phi Beta Kappa Society, in which he spoke of his philosophy of transcendentalism. The speech was published that same year. It made Emerson famous, and it brought the ideas of transcendentalism to young men like Henry David Thoreau.

Emerson had been a Unitarian minister, but he had resigned and was becoming very critical of the current practice of Christianity, which he made clear in this commencement address. He said: “The true Christianity — a faith like Christ’s in the infinitude of man — is lost.” Many in the audience were incensed by Emerson’s speech, particularly the older faculty and ministers. It was 30 years before Emerson was invited back to speak at Harvard.

https://www.writersalmanac.org/index.html%3Fp=6349.html

Mean and sublime experiencer

It’s the birthday of American author, poet, philosopher, abolitionist, tax resister, and transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, born in Concord, Massachusetts (1817). After graduating from Harvard, he worked in his father’s pencil factory. He taught for a time, but resigned because he didn’t want to administer corporal punishment. He opened a school with his brother, John, but John caught tetanus after cutting himself shaving and died in Thoreau’s arms.

He went to work for Ralph Waldo Emerson, the poet and leader of the American transcendentalist movement. Thoreau moved into Emerson’s house and tutored his children. After he accidentally burned down 300 acres of woods near Concord, his friend Ellery Channing told him: “Go out upon that, build yourself a hut, and there begin the grand process of devouring yourself alive. I see no other alternative, no other hope for you.”

On July 4, 1845, Thoreau entered the woods at Walden Pond near Concord, built a small cabin, and spent two years, two months, and two days listening to whip-poor-wills singing, frogs croaking, and owls hooting. He cultivated beans, ate fish, salt pork, and woodchuck, and spent considerable time pondering which pond was more beautiful: Walden Pond, Flint’s Pond, or White Pond. He always left three chairs ready for visitors. It was a grand experiment: to see if simple self-sufficiency could lead to a greater, more objective understanding of society.

It took almost nine years for Thoreau to complete his book on his experience in the woods. He titled the book Walden; or, A Life in the Woods (1854). The book became the foundation for the future movements of ecology and environmentalism. Thoreau developed a penchant for yoga and Hinduism. He contracted tuberculosis, which set his health back, and after spending a rainy evening counting tree rings on a stump, he developed bronchitis and never recovered. On his deathbed, his Aunt Louise asked if he had made his peace with God. Thoreau replied, “I did not know we had ever quarreled.”

In Walden, Thoreau writes: “I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan- like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms, and, if it proved to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness of it, and publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my next excursion.”

https://www.garrisonkeillor.com/radio/the-writers-almanac-for-sunday-july-12-2026/

Claude, who has explored the pragmatism-existentialism connection?

• Richard Bernstein, Praxis and Action (1971) — the classic direct comparison of pragmatism and existentialism on action/freedom.

• Cornel West, The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism — his “prophetic pragmatism” draws heavily on existentialist themes of contingency and tragedy; a chapter on this pairing also appears in the Routledge volume Cornel West and Philosophy, by Clarence Johnson.

• John Lachs (your own dissertation advisor) — Stoic Pragmatism and In Love with Life fuse James/Dewey pragmatism with existential concerns about finitude and mortality. Given your history with Lachs, this may be the most natural entry point.

• Sidney Hook’s 1959 Antioch Review essay “Pragmatism and Existentialism” — not a book, but foundational; a pragmatist’s take contrasting the two on truth and freedom.

• For the truth-theory angle specifically, there’s scholarship on James’s influence on Sartre’s existentialism, largely via a posthumously published 1948 text, Truth and Existence, where Sartre engages James’s pragmatic theory of truth against Heidegger.

Nothing currently occupies the exact title Existential Pragmatism — so that territory does still look open, as you’d noted before.