Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Bill Bryson

 I've been on a Bryson kick lately, re-reading Made in America and One Summer: America, 1927, and listening to a collection of his various BBC appearances over the years. He has a unique perspective on Americana: born and raised in Des Moines, he's spent most of his adult life in England but recently has been back and forth enough to feel like a "suave cosmopolitan"... and he's very funny.

But this is one of his serious moments:

“Take a moment from time to time to remember that you are alive. I know this sounds a trifle obvious, but it is amazing how little time we take to remark upon this singular and gratifying fact. By the most astounding stroke of luck an infinitesimal portion of all the matter in the universe came together to create you and for the tiniest moment in the great span of eternity you have the incomparable privilege to exist.”
― Bill Bryson, I'm a Stranger Here Myself: Notes on Returning to America After Twenty Years Away

I'm looking forward to diving into his latest:


 

Questions Jy 30

Anderson, ch9-11; McDermott, ch11-12; Romano, Part 4. REPORT: Erica, Women in Philosophy...

  1. See last time's questions pertaining to Romano's discussion of women in philosophy, #'s 16-19...
  2. Part Four of America the Philosophical is about "cyberphilosophy," a term that already sounds dated. (AtP is over a decade old now.) But do you think the presence of contemporary philosophers and students of philosophy on the internet is likely to make consumers of that content more reflective and wise, and ultimately to raise our culture's tone of discourse? Will it create conditions of greater public civility? Or has the internet just become a "place" where people go to find others who share their prejudices and political biases, rather than a place to challenge them and think them through?
  3. "You have the people of the book, which is the East Coast, and the people of the screen, which is the West Coast." 469  Are we all people of the screen now, even the relative few of us who still read for pleasure and enlightenment? Is my "Save the book" bumper sticker promoting a lost cause? (NOTE: I own, borrow, and read lots of books on my kindle, but a culture of the screen is one which seems to place less value on the word than the image. Are we there yet, or headed there?)
  4. Do you think the computer revolution is "a living fulfillment of... the pragmatism of James and Dewey"? 474
  5. "...the only solution [is] better educated citizens... dedicated to 'the common good.'" 482 True? Likely?
  6. "Machines are becoming biological and the biological is becoming engineered." Are Kevin Kelly, Ray Kurzweil et al prophets of the Singularity? Is it getting nearer?
  7. Is the "global brain" hypothesis kooky or plausible? Or Gaia? 489  Do both represent a misplaced "impulse to worship" (technology in the first instance, the earth in the latter)? 495
  8. Can you recommend any good sci-fi/cyberlit? 496ff.
  9. Is Jaron Lanier right? Are we, or will we become, "gadgets"? 531 Comment?: “But the Turing test cuts both ways. You can't tell if a machine has gotten smarter or if you've just lowered your own standards of intelligence to such a degree that the machine seems smart. If you can have a conversation with a simulated person presented by an AI program, can you tell how far you've let your sense of personhood degrade in order to make the illusion work for you?"
  10. Do you listen to any philosophy-themed podcasts?*
  11. Do you find Dewey's "sensible mysticism" preferable to an "otherworldly mysticism"? Do you agree with Anderson that it is more attuned to the "American quest"?142
  12. Springsteen, Little Feat, Warren Zevon, Neil Young... some of my favorites. Yours? What about any of the other musicians mentioned in Anderson's ch9?
  13. "Marcuse's one-dimensional man who is doomed to an Archie Bunker status": the exception in America, or the rule? 149
  14. What do you think of the juxtaposition of Springsteen's "Born to Run" with Thoreau's "Walking"? 153-4   Do both express something like Whitman's democratic vision?
  15. Dewey said "a democracy cannot long be sustained by an ignorant demos." Agree? Is that what we've got? 159   Can we effectively teach "sympathy with those who sincerely hold opinions different from our own"? 161
  16. What can be done to rectify the situation in which "the majority of our high school students arrive at college with no conception of what philosophers do or why [they] do it"? 166
  17. If "the community" cared for all children as the best and wisest parents do, would it be so "oblivious" to the children victimized by war and neglect? McD 169
  18. What do you think of the Montessori approach to childhood education? 174ff.
  19. Do you agree that we need "a radical transformation of the curriculum in teacher education programs"? 180
  20. Should students be more thoroughly introduced to "the experience of others," especially accomplished others in our cultural past, via the reading and study of biography? 188-9   Do you recall being impacted in school by a famous or accomplished person's biography? If so, who and how?
  21. What else in this week's reading would you like to discuss? 
Anticipating Erica's report: 
Recent books on women in philosophy I've enjoyed: 
  • Metaphysical Animals: How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life by Rachael Wiseman and Clare Mac Cumhaill... 
  • The Visionaries: Arendt, Beauvoir, Rand, Weil, and the Power of Philosophy in Dark Times by Wolfram Eilenberger... 
  • The Philosopher Queens: The lives and legacies of philosophy's unsung women by Rebecca Buxton and Lisa Whiting... 
  • The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics by Benjamin Lipscomb... Also see 
  • Maria Popova's Figuring and her excellent website "The Marginalian"...  

 
The history of philosophy has not done women justice: you’ve probably heard the names Plato, Kant, Nietzsche and Locke – but what about Hypatia, Arendt, Oluwole and Young?

The Philosopher Queens is a long-awaited book about the lives and works of women in philosophy by women in philosophy. This collection brings to centre stage twenty prominent women whose ideas have had a profound – but for the most part uncredited – impact on the world.

You’ll learn about Ban Zhao, the first woman historian in ancient Chinese history; Angela Davis, perhaps the most iconic symbol of the American Black Power Movement; Azizah Y. al-Hibri, known for examining the intersection of Islamic law and gender equality; and many more.

For anyone who has wondered where the women philosophers are, or anyone curious about the history of ideas – it's time to meet the philosopher queens. g'r

 


Carl Sagan’s account of Hypatia’s murder and the death of The Library
of Alexandria in the original Cosmos television series. 1980.

==

Women in philosophy blog (APA)... Seven female philosophers you should know about (Ethics Centre)

==

*I asked AI (chatGPT) for a quick list of top philosophy podcasts. I recognize most of these as good, I hope it didn't "hallucinate" the rest. (Also good: Philosophy Bites (Listen to Kate Manne on Misogyny and Male Entitlement), In Our Time (de Tocq; archive, ...)

The Partially Examined Life A philosophy podcast by some former philosophy grad students discussing major works in a fun and accessible manner.

Philosophize This! Hosted by Stephen West, this podcast provides an engaging introduction to various philosophers and their ideas, starting from ancient to modern times.

The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps Peter Adamson's podcast covers the entire history of philosophy, episode by episode, from ancient Greece to contemporary thought.

Very Bad Wizards Not strictly a philosophy podcast, but explores philosophical topics in a humorous and engaging way, often combining philosophy with psychology.

Elucidations: A University of Chicago Philosophy Podcast Conversations with philosophers about their work and ideas, hosted by Matt Teichman.

New Books in Philosophy Interviews with philosophers about their new books across a wide range of philosophical topics.

Hi-Phi Nation A narrative-style podcast that brings philosophical ideas to life through stories and real-world examples.

The Philosophy Guy A podcast that explores various philosophical ideas and issues, often with a focus on contemporary topics.

The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast A British podcast that covers a range of philosophical topics and texts in an accessible way.

The American Philosophical Association Podcast Series Offers discussions and interviews with philosophers on various topics in American philosophy and beyond.

==

The Tennessee State Museum is chock-full of Americana...


Centennial Park, too, site of the 1897 Tennessee Centennial Exposition

The suffragettes who pushed Tennessee to ratify the 19th amendment in 1920 are represented there.

 




NASA 🎂

Happy Birthday, NASA! 🚀💫🎂🛰️🎉

President Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act on this day in 1958, creating a new federal agency dedicated to exploring the great beyond: NASA.

Project Mercury, NASA's first major undertaking, would set the space race into motion and put the United States on the path to landing on the moon.
https://to.pbs.org/44Kh1n9

And if you read no books at all…

"If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking."

— Haruki Murakami

https://www.threads.net/@philosophors/post/C-Crg_OiFK6/?xmt=AQGzLTPnDiJW0UM7cHqR85rpLqAesxSxKKISvtD6ieWT0Q

Uncommon wisdom, nowadays

For a French aristocrat born 219 years ago, on July 29, 1805, Alexis de Tocqueville sure had some prescient things to say about American society and politics. From his landmark Democracy in America, published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840: "In the United States, the common man has understood how the general prosperity affects his own happiness—a very simple idea, yet one of which the people in most countries have only a very limited grasp."

https://www.threads.net/@libraryofamerica/post/C-An_erONct/?xmt=AQGz1iYeVIdid6Iwin0WuLeCn3wkpFXKc5wV9UZaCUx75A

Into the Heart of Life: Richard Powers on Living with Bewilderment at the Otherworldly Wonder of Our World – The Marginalian

Maria Popova again has me thinking this (like its predecessor "Overstory") would be a good text for Environmental Ethics. Bioethics too.

"…Set sometime in the near future, when our search for life beyond the Solar System has come to its inevitable fruition, [Bewilderment] tells the story of a thirty-nine-year-old astrobiologist and his neurodivergent, frightened, boundlessly courageous nine-year-old son, searching together for other worlds and instead discovering how to reworld ours with meaning. 

Radiating from their quest is a luminous invitation to live up to our nature not as creatures consumed by "the black hole of the self," as Powers so perfectly puts it in his talk, but as living empathy machines and portable cosmoses of possibility, whose planetary story is yet unwritten…

As the father searches for other worlds, he is savaged by despair at humanity's catastrophic mismanagement of this one, haunted by the growing sense that we couldn't possibly be good interplanetary emissaries until we have become good stewards of our own home planet. But each time he hits rock bottom, he bounces back up — as we all do, as we all must in order to go on living — with rekindled faith in what we are capable of…"

https://www.themarginalian.org/2022/06/26/richard-powers-bewilderment/

truly democratic

"In a truly democratic society, civil rights should not be contingent on a fortuitous combination of Supreme Court Justices." Revisit Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor's essay, from 2020, exploring the undemocratic nature of the Court.

https://www.threads.net/@newyorkermag/post/C-Bjva5ykiN/?xmt=AQGz1MRnum5QLI8qIwXc3EozzP12b9r3k-k8oLjZJVHo2g

Too easy

"It is easier for the world to accept a simple lie than a complex truth."
Alexis de Tocqueville, born on this day in 1805

https://www.threads.net/@reboomer/post/C-AgO0hpEq_/?xmt=AQGztcujdDXbzT6jtwrwkhN3AsWxafqiquSsQ0bEr1V7fg

Monday, July 29, 2024

Shelf envy

 Some famous authors' personal home libraries...

Monteagle

 My wife and our best friends Nell and Pita just had a charming long weekend at a cabin in the woods of Monteagle, TN, near the University of the South. The place is steeped in Americana, including the Highlander Folk School and the "teahouse" future writers Walker Percy and Shelby Foote constructed at Lost Cove as teenagers in the '30s.


 




Twisted

How 'Twisters' Failed Us and Our Burning Planet [American as climate denial]

"… I'm not arguing that Mr. Chung should have turned his 122 minutes of beautifully rendered cinematic escapism into an Anthropocene screed. But artifacts of popular culture have always had immense power to articulate changing attitudes, engage empathy and open firmly resistant minds. Think about how swiftly Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" changed attitudes toward the fragile natural world and led to new regulations of synthetic pesticides, or how Joni Mitchell's "Big Yellow Taxi" and John Prine's "Paradise" expanded awareness of the environmental movement. A decade ago, the CBS drama "Madam Secretary" proved that even a single episode with a climate-based story line could significantly affect viewers' understanding of the human costs of climate change.

This is why Percy Bysshe Shelley called poets "the unacknowledged legislators of the world." When art changes opinions or opens hearts, it changes the world as profoundly as any legislation does.

With MAGA politicians at every level denying that climate change even exists, real climate legislation is now nearly impossible to pass. And with the Supreme Court determined to quash all executive-branch efforts to address the changing climate, too, we seem to be at the mercy of artists to save us.

If only they would. In a missed opportunity the size of an F5 tornado's debris field, we got no help from the makers of 'Twisters.'"

--Margaret Renkl

truth vs. certainty

"Knowledge consists in the search for truth… It is not the search for certainty."

Karl Popper, born on this day in 1902, on truth vs. certainty and the dangers of relativism: https://www.themarginalian.org/2017/01/26/karl-popper-in-search-of-a-better-world-truth-certainty/

Lucy Burns

Lucy Burns, co-founder of the National Women's Party, was born on July 28, 1879 in what is now Brooklyn, New York. Willing to risk imprisonment for the cause of women's suffrage, Burns was arrested six times—more than any other suffragist.

https://www.threads.net/@americanexperiencepbs/post/C9_PgvsC2jb/?xmt=AQGzn25QpWG-k2rYJE8_VKrz4Ae9hzMgRawmhuBJi6Xecg

Saturday, July 27, 2024

Nixon’s impeachment

Fifty years ago today, the House Judiciary Committee voted on the first article of impeachment against President Nixon. They would ultimately approve three: obstruction of justice, abuse of power and contempt of Congress.

📸: @LibraryCongress

https://www.threads.net/@americanexperiencepbs/post/C97vTarKlxY/?xmt=AQGzZhbQDLBtKS4PYdDgXn4GXlgh0BydtAP9_VYFU7FqgA

Olympics

The year was 1996. Keith Sweat had us "Twisted", Alanis Morrisette asked, "Isn't it Ironic?" and the city of Atlanta was ready to prove itself on the world stage as it opened the centennial Olympic Games.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/1996-atlanta-summer-olympics/?utm_campaign=americanexperience&utm_content=1722031861&utm_medium=social&utm_source=threads

See the USA in your Chevrolet (if you can)

On this day in 1943, a thick "hellish cloud" reeking of bleach descended on the city of Los Angeles.

Residents flew into a panic, suspecting a Japanese chemical attack. But the real culprit was their cars. It was the first wave of "smog" to hit the City of Angels, though the phenomenon would become a familiar, and dangerous, presence in the decades to come.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1943-hellish-cloud-was-most-vivid-warning-las-smog-problems-come-180964119/

Where the buck stopped

On July 26, 1948, Harry Truman gave the spoiler wing of his party a lesson in Presidential power when he issued Executive Orders 9980 and 9981, officially desegregating the United States Armed Forces and all agencies of the federal government.

https://www.threads.net/@americanexperiencepbs/post/C95cvS5Ndvz/?xmt=AQGztSWjwi84vQ5Q83D_txTGoS3yCR2MAvWHa0T-09Q-PA

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

Even Trumpier

Trump's 2024 Convention Speech Had More Falsehoods Than His 2016 One

A comparison of former President Donald J. Trump's addresses before the Republican National Convention in 2016 and 2024 demonstrates how his relationship to the truth has changed [Well, it hasn't changed; it's worsened. Give him more time, he'll give you more lies and B.S.]

...the address Mr. Trump gave in 2024 was akin to one he might deliver at a rally, and almost twice as long as his speech in 2016 by the amount of words. The number of inaccurate claims also doubled, according to a New York Times analysis. In the span of two minutes of his acceptance speech this year, he rattled off five exaggerated or false claims.
nyt 

Greater part of LIFE , possibly

And I tell students that all the time.

"In university they don't tell you that the greater part of the law is learning to tolerate fools." — Doris Lessing

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Questions Jy 23

 Anderson, ch-6-8; McDermott, ch8-10; Romano, Part 3. REPORT: Gary, Pragmatism & 12-step programs

  1. I jumped the gun on that question about country music (Anderson ch6) last time, so here's another shot at it: is any genre of music "wild" in a way Thoreau would recognize as preservative ("in wildness is the preservation of the world" etc.)?
  2. Have you had a mystical experience? Or do you, like WJ, have instead "the germ of mysticism"? (/113) If you have, presumably you cannot describe it (that's what a mystical experience is, after all--a meaningful experience you can't put into words); but can you say anything informative about it at all? Do you respect or sympathize with the experience of those who do say they've experienced something mystically significant? Are you skeptical but tolerant? Alternatively, if you've had mystical experiences, are you tolerant of those who haven't?
  3. What do you think of WJ's defense of experience against philosophy (120) and his statement that the goal of religion is not God but "life, more life..."? 122
  4. Have you or anyone you know experienced the sort of conversion (like that of AA and other 12-step programs) that brought "a changed attitude towards life"? 124
  5. Is your life "pervade[d] by" extraordinary experiences of immediacy that you'd describe as transcendent or mystical (but NOT supernatural), such as listening to music, engaging in an intense discussion, losing [your]self in a film or novel"? 135
  6. "To me faith means not worrying." Does this also apply to naturalists and humanists who do NOT possess a faith in anything supernatural? 141 **
  7. What do you make of WJ's 1898 "Walpurgis nacht" experience? ***
  8.  "We as human beings have no natural place." McD 134 Is that true? Why isn't every place our natural place, if in fact we are (as discussed last time) "citizens of the cosmos"? Or do some of us suffer Unheimlichkeit, "ultimate homelessness," when we "raise a wall" meant to define the borders of home? /135
  9. Did "the ancients ha[ve] it right, bury the things with the person"? /137  What things do you want to spend eternity with? And does McD's discussion of "things" remind you of George Carlin's "stuff"?*
  10. Can you relate (so to speak) to any of McD's relational experiences (starvation, amputation, saturation, seduction, repression)? 152-56  Do you think you have a healthy relationship with relations, in your life?
  11. Have you fully faced and accepted your own mortality? Do you agree that we can find a middle way between "the self-deception of personal immortality" and "creative, probing, building lives..."? 164 
  12. Do you agree with McD (and Rilke) that although we will be terminated we cannot be cancelled, and that's cause for celebration? 168 
  13. If it's true that John Locke was a slave-trade investor, Bishop George Berkeley a slave-owner, and David Hume a "committed racist," should they be "canceled" or removed from the canon of classic and standard curricula of western philosophy? Romano 319
  14. Did you see Cornel West (331ff.) when he visited MTSU (in the Tennessee Room, across the hall from our classroom) last year? Do you find him provocative in a socially-constructive Socratic "gadfly" sort of way? Is his presidential candidacy philosophically motivated, do you think? Is it wise?
  15. Do you read The Ethicist (Kwame Anthony Appiah, 336f.) in the NYTimes Magazine? Do you think he dispenses sound advice and counsel?
  16. You probably weren't taught the tragic story of Hypatia and the Library at Alexandria (344f.) in school. Why not, do you think? 
  17. Do you think Hannah Arendt's "banality of evil" (366) is relevant to events and attitudes in our time? How so?
  18. Any comment on any of these Arendt quotes?
  19. Do you think Betty Friedan and other modern-era feminists have raised the social status of women in our society? 376f.
  20. Should native American philosophy be treated, as Scott Pratt says, as "a fundamental source" of wisdom (448), for instance in articulating the appropriate human stance towards non-human nature?
  21. More coming soon...
  22. What else in the readings this week would you like us to discuss?

Anticipating Gary's presentation (and see: How WJ inspired the 12-step movement)...

  

William James, more than anyone else, was responsible for introducing the wide range of topics that now comprise the broad field of psychology. In his magnificent text, The Principles of Psychology, he explored and expanded what was then known about neuroscience, cognition, emotion, perception, and behavior and left a legacy of inquiry into the workings of human experience that still fuels this social science. This film presents some of James's most important formulations, including his discussions of habit, consciousness, will, and religious experience with current live-action illustrations. Dr. McDermott's commentary reminds viewers that James's work also prods us to lead our own individual lives with courage, openess to possibilities and awareness to what James referred to as the "fringe" of experience. This fringe includes the hunches, un-expressible feelings, and haunting memories that influence our thoughts and actions. An interview with a young recovering alcoholic and an account of James's own struggle with suicidal depression make this film an emotionally moving experience as well as an instructional one for students.

*

 

** "In dealing with the work of Dewey, it feels fitting to end with neither a bang nor a whimper but to round out my tale of his sensible mysticism in sermonesque fashion. In 1879 Dewey moved from Burlington, Vermont, to teach high school for three years in the wilds of Oil City, Pennsylvania. He later recalled to his friend Max Eastman a transitional experience he had while there: ‘‘There was no vision,’’ Eastman reported, ‘‘not even a definable emotion—just a supremely blissful feeling that his worries were over.’’ Dewey described a ‘‘oneness with the universe’’ and a feeling that ‘‘everything that’s here is here, and you can just lie back on it.’’9 Consequently Dewey claimed, ‘‘I’ve never had any doubts since then, nor any beliefs. To me faith means not worrying.’’10 It is not merely coincidental that Dewey’s philosophical career was launched during his stay in Oil City. He moved directly to a life of thinking—with emphasis on the gerund— and of ongoing experiential engagement in the world through teaching, art, and politics. Indeed, his actions well meet Hocking’s criteria for the worship of the pragmatic mystic: a mystic’s worship ‘‘takes on the aspect of a more deliberate, intense, and thorough thinking.’’11 Dewey, the Clark Kentish figure of our didactic histories, was living on the edge, though we may fail to see it. It is important to the pragmatic meaning of Dewey’s thought that we not forget it." 141
==
*** "...The steep descent takes an hour or two, and James arrived in the bottom of the gorge, at the rough cabin that stood there then, to find Pauline Goldmark; her brother, Charles; Waldo Adler, the son of Felix Adler, founder of the Society for Ethical Culture; and two college girls “drest in boy's breeches,” as he couldn't help writing to his wife. It had been a rough, nearly 10-mile day, beginning for James at 5 a.m.

The guide made dinner and built a cozy fire inside. But that night James tossed and turned while his other youthful cabin mates slumbered. He told his wife, Alice, in the extraordinary letter he wrote her two days later, that he arose and walked out to the brook that drains the gorge. And then something happened to him.

“The moon rose and hung above the scene, leaving a few of the larger stars visible,” he wrote, “and I entered into a state of spiritual alertness of the most vital description. The influences of Nature, the wholesomeness of the people around me, especially the good Pauline, the thought of you and the children ... the problem of the Edinburgh lectures, all fermented within me till it became a regular Walpurgis nacht.” (Walpurgisnacht is the night before May Day, when spirits walked the earth, according to Germanic lore.)

However deep and meaningful the feeling, he couldn't really explain it — as he later showed others had been unable to explain their own similar experiences. “It seemed as if all the gods of the nature-mythologies were holding an indescribable meeting in my breast with the moral gods of the inner life,” he wrote to his wife. But it was a turning point in his intellectually peripatetic life. After that night at Panther Gorge, he understood spiritual reality not as a concept, or as something privileged, but as an unexceptional property of human consciousness and a fact of life..." --continues, The Geography of Religious Experience, NYTimes 9.9.07
==
James and Dewey both endorsed natural transcendence/mysticism:

 

Monday, July 22, 2024

Cheers! (a personal note)

[LISTEN on Substack]

Time for a re-write of the Pythons’ Philosophers Drinking Song, the one insinuating that the old dead philosophers (including “John Stuart Mill of his own free will”) were lushes.

Gary's going to talk to us about the link between William James's philosophy and the 12-step recovery movement, including AA and similarly-structured programs that emphasize acknowledging one's personal ultimate impotence and the need to rely on a Higher Power (which may or may not mean God or something supernatural) to boost the will in the face of an addiction.

A good pragmatist will always say that when such programs work for anyone, they "pay their way" and show themselves to be reliable and even in touch with truth.

A good pragmatist will also always say that different approaches work better for some than others, and that one size does not fit all. (A good pragmatist is, in other words, also a pluralist.)

I try to be a good pragmatist.

I'm coming up on my one year anniversary of not consuming alcohol. 

For most of my adult life I've enjoyed a beer with dinner, frequently preceded by a bit of Kentucky's finest. I subscribed to novelist Walker Percy's philosophy of bourbon:

The joy of bourbon drinking is not the pharmacological effect of the C2H5OH on the cortex but rather the instant of the whiskey being knocked back and the little explosion of Kentucky U.S.A. sunshine in the cavity of the nasopharynx and the hot bosky bite of Tennessee summertime--aesthetic considerations to which the effect of the alcohol is, if not dispensable, at least secondary.

A year on, I miss that particular aesthetic form of Kentucky sunshine. (I do still experience Tennessee summertime, via a different aesthetic.) But not enough to revisit it, not yet anyway.

Two years ago my buddies and I did our annual late-summer meetup in the environs of Lexington KY, where we combined our shared passion for (minor league) baseball with a spin along the Kentucky Bourbon Trail. Glad I got that out of my system.

What I decided a year ago was that I wanted to prioritize my long-term health, and I'd read enough evidence at that point to persuade me that no amount of alcohol was consistent with that priority.

But I was never comfortable with the 12-step insistence on essentializing my relation to alcohol, the idea that I was under the sway of a compulsion before which my own assertive will was powerless. Irrelevant. Nothing, it seems to me, could be less Jamesian than to sideline one's volitional impulses precisely when they most need to be engaged and committed to. 

So I looked around for a different approach. I found Annie Grace's This Naked Mind, I read her books, and it made sense to me when she said things like

“We need to stop asking ourselves if we have a problem with alcohol and start to get curious about how much better our lives could be.”

I agreed with her citation of the Buddha:

“No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path.”

We ourselves must choose to walk the path.

I liked the emphasis on drinking or not drinking being a choice, not in my case a disease; and I decided to choose to drink only when I wanted to--not from mindless habit. I did not wish to concede my powerlessness, or the irrelevance of my will to choose. I do not concede them, again in my case

I know there are many others whose relation to alcohol is indeed compulsory and not free. Many others do benefit from the public declaration of impotence, from a surrender of will and a professed reliance on whatever they mean by a Higher Power... and reliance on a supportive community of peers who've traveled a similar road.

So good for them. Good for whatever works, whatever conduces to one's health and happiness.

Fortunately, for those who do not find the 12-step approach a congenial fit for their own case or circumstances, there are other alternatives to AA (et al) besides Annie Grace's. To name just a few:

Alternative Programs to AA
  • Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Recovery.
  • Women for Sobriety.
  • Secular Organizations for Sobriety (S.O.S.).
  • LifeRing Secular Recovery.
  • Moderation Management.
  • Evidence-based and science-based treatments.
  • Holistic therapies.
  • Experiential therapies.

In light of some of the items on that list, I want to say that in my case I choose not to speak the language of "sobriety"--anyone who knows me will tell you that I am and always have been "sober, "probably to a fault much of the time. 

But just as I would never announce (as I understand they do at AA meetings) "I am an alcoholic" even after having refrained from drinking for an extended time, years even, I would also never announce that I am sober (in the reverse sense of the statement). That's what I mean by not "essentializing" my relation to drink. Pragmatists (like Aristotelians and Existentialists) think we are what we repeatedly do, not what in the distant past we previously did.

 So I lift my glass of sparkling water or kombucha or (more often) my Stanley mug of fresh-brewed coffee to all who've found or fashioned an effective strategy for choosing a better relation to their own ingestibles of healthy preference. Whatever it may be, whatever they may be. To your happiness.

Cheers! 


Why Are There Neo-Nazis on the Streets of Nashville?

"I wish I could say I was shocked when neo-Nazis started parading around downtown Nashville last week, wearing shirts emblazoned with swastikas and the words "Pro-white." I wish I could say I was shocked when they asked passers-by, "Are you a Jew?," or when they terrified a child, or when they unfurled a hate-filled bannerfor interstate drivers to see. Even on Tuesday night, when they disrupted a meeting of the Metro Council, spouting "antisemitic, homophobic and racist diatribes," according to the Nashville Scene's Eli Motycka, I couldn't say I was surprised.

Just a week earlier, a different group marched on our streets carrying Confederate flags, and in February white supremacists marched here to celebrate "the great white South." As a blue city in a deep-red state, Nashville has become an appealing target for people who fear diversity. "Diversity means fewer white people," read the flyers that last week's marchers handed out. "Inclusion means exclusion of white people. Equity means stealing from white people."

In an irony of timing, "Dynamite Nashville: Unmasking the FBI, the KKK, and the Bombers Beyond Their Control," a new book by the Nashville historian Betsy T. Phillips, was published on the same day that white supremacists harassed Nashville's Metro Council. The book offers a necessary reminder of the world these neo-Nazis are nostalgic for.

"Dynamite Nashville" is an attempt to find out who was behind three unsolved Nashville bombings of the early civil rights era: at the Hattie Cotton School in 1957, the Jewish Community Center in 1958 and the home of Z. Alexander Looby, a Black civil rights attorney and Nashville City Council member, in 1960. No one was ever charged for the crimes..."

Sunday, July 21, 2024

Bonds and bridges (and 🎳)

Robert Putnam Knows Why You're Lonely

"…You distinguish between two types of social capital, right? There's bonding social capital and there's bridging social capital. 

Ties that link you to people like yourself are called bonding social capital. So, my ties to other elderly, male, white, Jewish professors — that's my bonding social capital. And bridging social capital is your ties to people unlike yourself. So my ties to people of a different generation or a different gender or a different religion or a different politic or whatever, that's my bridging social capital. I'm not saying "bridging good, bonding bad," because if you get sick, the people who bring you chicken soup are likely to reflect your bonding social capital. But I am saying that in a diverse society like ours, we need a lot of bridging social capital. And some forms of bonding social capital are really awful. The K.K.K. is pure social capital — bonding social capital can be very useful, but it can also be extremely dangerous. So far, so good, except that bridging social capital is harder to build than bonding social capital. That's the challenge, as I see it, of America today…"
NYT Mag, continues


Once we bowled in leagues, usually after work--but no longer. This seemingly small phenomenon symbolizes a significant social change that Robert Putnam has identified in this brilliant volume, which The Economist hailed as "a prodigious achievement."

Drawing on vast new data that reveal Americans' changing behavior, Putnam shows how we have become increasingly disconnected from one another and how social structures--whether they be PTA, church, or political parties--have disintegrated. Until the publication of this groundbreaking work, no one had so deftly diagnosed the harm that these broken bonds have wreaked on our physical and civic health, nor had anyone exalted their fundamental power in creating a society that is happy, healthy, and safe.

Like defining works from the past, such as The Lonely Crowd and The Affluent Society, and like the works of C. Wright Mills and Betty Friedan, Putnam's Bowling Alone has identified a central crisis at the heart of our society and suggests what we can do. g'r

And see:

Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in its Place
by Robert B. Talisse

We live in an age of political polarization. As political beliefs on the left and the right have been pulled closer to the extremes, so have our social environments: we seldom interact with those with whom we don't see eye to eye. Making matters worse, we are being appealed to--by companies, products, and teams, for example--based on our deep-seated, polarized beliefs. Our choice of Starbucks or Dunkin' Donuts, Costco or Sam's Club, soccer or football, New York Times vs. Wall Street Journal is an expression of our beliefs and a reinforcement of our choice to stay within the confines of our self-selected political community, making us even more polarized. Letting it bleed into these choices in every corner of our lives, we take democracy too far and it ends up keeping us apart. We overdo democracy.

When we overdo democracy, we allow it to undermine and crowd out many of the most important social goods that democracy is meant to deliver. What's more, in overdoing democracy, we spoil certain social goods that democracy needs in order to flourish. A thriving democracy needs citizens to reserve space in their social lives for collective activities that are not structured by political allegiances. To ensure the health and the future of democracy, we need to forge civic friendships by working together in social contexts in which political affiliations and party loyalties are not merely suppressed, but utterly beside the point.

Drawing on his extensive research, Talisse sheds light on just how deeply entrenched our political polarization has become and opens our eyes to how often we allow politics to dictate the way we see almost everything. By limiting our interactions with others and our experience of the world so that we only encounter the politically like-minded, we are actually damaging the thing that democracy is meant to preserve in the first place: the more fundamental good of recognizing and respecting each other's standing as equals.

“In the best interest of my party and my country”

Read Biden's Letter Withdrawing From the Race

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/21/us/biden-withdraw-letter.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Saturday, July 20, 2024

Eagle landed

On July 20, 1969, astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon in the lunar module "Eagle." Afterward, Aldrin posed for this inspiring photo, taken by Armstrong, beside the United States flag. The Apollo 11 mission's main goal was to perform a crewed lunar landing and return to Earth.
#ThoseWhoInspire #NeilArmstrong #BuzzAldrin #moonlanding

https://www.threads.net/@thosewhoinspire/post/C9o9--asjvi/?xmt=AQGzY02qSsPDasqysuWwd70KG1Ll-nzszG97Or7W7KUG3w

Friday, July 19, 2024

For the record

On Thursday, PolitiFact published its 1,000th fact check of a claim made by Donald Trump. The publication, which usually refrains from wading into political discussions or weighing in on a politician’s overall character, took the opportunity to release an analysis of those years of work. Its finding? Trump lies a lot.

“American fact-checkers have never encountered a politician who shares Trump’s disregard for factual accuracy,” the authors wrote. “Ever since he descended the escalator at Trump Tower in 2015, we have encountered a firehose of claims.”

The analysis found in particular that Trump’s immigration-related claims tended toward inflammatory falsehoods and that more than 70 percent of PolitiFact’s checks on immigration, foreign policy, crime, COVID, and health care were largely false. It concluded, also, that “Trump’s falsehoods have fueled threats to democracy.”
...
Donald Trump makes so many patently false claims that are recycled from earlier claims, but with some slight variation. How do you decide whether it’s worth it to fact-check these kinds of endless falsehoods?

Our friendly rivals, the Washington Post Fact Checker, did something like “37,000 questionable claims by Trump” and counted repeated claims in that. And they started to do what they call a “bottomless Pinocchio,” for when somebody repeats something so often... Slate
==
HCR:

"...Since Saturday’s shooting, it has been notable that there has not been a medical review of Trump’s injuries, although he has said he was injured by a bullet that ripped through his ear. This matters not only because of the extent of his injuries, but also because Trump has made the story part of his identity without any fact check, and the media appears simply to be letting it go on Trump’s say-so, something that adds to the sense that media outlets are treating Trump and Biden differently.

Last night, Trump perhaps tried to address this lack by recounting last Saturday’s shooting. Interestingly, he did not say he was hit by a bullet, but that when he felt the injury he thought, “it can only be a bullet.” Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo today noted a report from local Pennsylvania television station WPXI that four motorcycle officers standing within feet of Trump suffered minor injuries from flying debris. Trump has likely cut off further discussion of the topic by saying it is too painful to tell the story again.

With that story behind him, Trump hit the theme of unity, saying he would bring the country together. “The discord and division in our society must be healed, we must heal it quickly. We are bound together by a single fate, a single destiny,” he said. “We rise together. Or we fall apart…. I am running to be president for all of America, not half of America, because there is no victory in winning for half of America. So tonight, with faith and devotion, I proudly accept your nomination for president of the United States.”

But that was just in the first ten minutes. Then Trump ignored the teleprompter and things veered far off course, reflecting the candidate that has stayed in the safe spaces of Mar-a-Lago and rallies of his loyalists for years. Trump rambled for more than 90 minutes, making it the longest acceptance speech in U.S. history and outlasting the interest of the audience, some of whom fell asleep.

He went on to recite his usual litany of lies: that Democrats cheated in the 2020 presidential election (they did not), that crime is going up (it’s plummeting), that inflation is the worst we’ve ever had (it’s around 3%; the worst was around 23%), that Democrats want to quadruple people’s taxes (CNN fact checker Daniel Dale calls this “imaginary”), and so on. Dale called it “a remarkably dishonest acceptance speech.”

Journalist James Fallows posted: “Of the maybe 10,000 political speeches I've heard over the years, this was overall the worst.”
..."
==
"...I will not, WILL NOT pretend there is anything normal about Trump or his "speech" last night. It was crazy.

It. Was. Crazy. And the collection of miscreants, racists, & felons assembled to take the stage this week was an embarrassment to the nation & before the world.

Does that make his supporters "forgotten Americans"who feel looked down upon & disrespected? Then they should make their conduct, their words, their values worthy of respect. Enough." 

Bob Newhart (1929-2024)

"I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'. " - Bob Newhart, RIP
Th'd

And now he's a Jedi.

 

Thursday, July 18, 2024

Call to the bullpen

Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin has written a letter appealing to President Biden's team loyalty in deciding whether to stay in the race. It concludes,

…I want to leave you with a final thought about baseball, the American game where even the finest pitchers have only around 110 pitches in them before their arms tire and begin to give out. In the eighth inning of the seventh game of the 2003 American League Championship  Series against the NewYorkYankees, Pedro Martinez, one of the greatest pitchers in Red Sox history, began to tire badly after 118 pitches and he gave up three straight hits and a run from Derek Jeter. The Red Sox Manager, Grady Little, visited the mound and Martinez vigorously protested that he was fine and he could continue and give it his all despite all the statistics about what happens when pitchers play after throwing for so long. Little kept him in and the Yankees proceeded to tie the game at the next at-bat with a two-run single and then went on to win the game with an 11th inning home run by Aaron Boone.

There is no shame in taking a well-deserved bow to the overflowing appreciation of the crowd when your arm is tired out, and there is real danger for the team in ignoring the statistics.

Your situation is tricky because you are both our star pitcher and our Manager. But in democracy, as you have shown us more than any prior president, you are not a Manager acting all alone; you are the co- Manager along with our great team and our great people. Caucus with the team, Mr. President. Hear them out. You will make the right decision.

With boundless admiration, affection and solidarity,

Jamie Raskin (MD-8)
Member, United States House of Representatives

Vote! (and then get out of town?)

 I'm going to be out of town on Aug.1, so...


The election officer thanked me for "coming in," I said we must vote while we still can. He agreed. But of course, my buddy pointed out, they vote in Russia, Rwanda, and North Korea. Just hope we don't end up wanting to vote with out feet. 

That same buddy says he and his wife are seriously considering a move to Nova Scotia, pending the November election. Another is looking at the south of France, another Italy, another Portugal. But we're all going to meet up first in Durham NC in August, before the diaspora.
Early voting in Nashville... in Rutherford County... Scene ballot guide... Banner voting guide... Nashville voter guide... Sample Davidson ballots

“A peculiarly American kind of terrorism”

"Thomas Crooks briefly tore a rupture in the fabric of American reality only to fill the space with a kind of silence, a mute biography and an unstated philosophy — a peculiarly American kind of terrorism," writes David Wallace-Wells.

https://www.threads.net/@nytopinion/post/C9iB75yOBLF/?xmt=AQGz1si_SeUZVzHYqfLMrQBJMU7uM_wvvcUZ0-30Su_hzQ

A Walden state of mind

"…What I've also learned from Thoreau is that mindfulness, properly embraced, is a continuing pursuit, something to practice without expecting perfection. He chastised himself for missing stuff, but the important thing, he pointed out, is to keep trying. "Be so little distracted," he wrote in 1851, "your thoughts so little confused, your engagements so few, your attention so free, your existence so mundane, that in all places and in all hours you can hear the sound of crickets in those seasons when they are to be heard." 

https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/The-Home-Forum/2024/0716/henry-david-thoreau-walden-pond-mindfulness-concord

Monkey see…

The hottest fashion accessary at the Republican National Convention is an ear bandage. It can be made of paper, napkin, or gauze and tape, but it must be white and on the right ear — the way Trump wore it when entering the convention hall.

https://wapo.st/3zJrPHj

https://www.threads.net/@washingtonpost/post/C9jE815xqB1/?xmt=AQGzIqiVEsR67BFsRsDYMCIt8syXHHWHX4gdFWpFfgN4iw

"Happiest Place on Earth"

When Disneyland opened its gates to the public for the first time on this day in 1955, visitors had been waiting in line since 2 a.m. to get inside the "Happiest Place on Earth".

In the first ten weeks, the park hosted more than one million guests, and soon became a favorite spot of visiting foreign dignitaries, from Indian Prime Minister Nehru to the King of Nepal.

https://www.threads.net/@americanexperiencepbs/post/C9ikuLKPrG0/?xmt=AQGzyFgnTbQfUahVRj4_xJzMXUviIgMeSSl6iNsejxl-_A

Wednesday, July 17, 2024

As I was (sorta) saying at the end of class last night…

"Keep busy with survival. Imitate the trees. Learn to lose in order to recover, and remember nothing stays the same for long, not even pain. Sit it out. Let it all pass. Let it go." —May Sarton, who died on Jy 16 in 1995*

(But "sit it out" does NOT mean becoming apathetic or disengaged. Early voting, for instance, has started. Do what you can, then accept what you cannot change and trust that a new season will come. That's Stoic Pragmatism.)  

*https://www.threads.net/@reboomer/post/C9e-rWRpoIu/?xmt=AQGzEco-0jWEFDOF2W6TgMxsx7cHudZ129AuNDdll8wsVA

Louis Menand on the origins of pragmatism

Nice presentation last night, Lauren!

If anyone wants to further explore the historical origins of pragmatism as an American philosophy, I recommend starting with Louis Menand's The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America.

 
The Metaphysical Club was an informal group that met in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872, to talk about ideas. Its members included Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr, founder of modern jurisprudence; William James, the father of modern American psychology; and Charles Sanders Peirce, logician, scientist and the founder of semiotics. The club was probably in existence for about nine months. No records were kept. The one thing we know that came out of it was an idea - an idea about ideas. This book is the story of that idea. Holmes, James and Peirce all believed that ideas are not things out there waiting to be discovered but are tools people invent - like knives and forks and microchips - to make their way in the world. They thought that ideas are produced not by individuals, but by groups of individuals - that ideas are social. They do not develop according to some inner logic of their own but are entirely dependent - like germs - on their human carriers and environment. They also thought that the survival of any idea depends not on its immutability but on its adaptability. g'r
  • “…in a universe in which events are uncertain and perception is fallible, knowing cannot be a matter of an individual mind ‘mirroring’ reality. Each mind reflects differently—even the same mind reflects differently at different moments—and in any case reality doesn’t stand still long enough to be accurately mirrored … knowledge must therefore be social.”
  • “We permit free expression because we need the resources of the whole group to get us the ideas we need.”
  • “If behaving as though we had free will or God exists gets us results we want, we will not only come to believe those things; they will be, pragmatically, true.”
  • “There is a difference between an idea and ideology.”
  • “It was not a matter of choosing sides, it was a matter of rising above the whole concept of sideness.”

WJS Newsletter (NEW!) – William James Society

https://wjsociety.org/news/